"We respectfully disagree with the majority decision in the Appellate Division", he said in a statement.
A state court judge last summer denied a motion by Trump's attorney to dismiss the suit, which accuses Trump of lying in response to Zervos' claims that he groped her in a Beverly Hills hotel and kissed her on the lips while she was on the show in 2007.
He called the women "liars" trying to harm his campaign with "100 percent fabricated" stories, and he retweeted a message specifically calling Zervos' claim "a hoax".More news: Barefoot, Handcuffed, New Zealand Shooter Smirks In Court
Zervos, an "Apprentice" contestant in 2005, accused Trump of kissing her against her will at a 2007 meeting in NY, and later groping her at a Beverly Hills hotel.
The panel's decision cites the decades-old Paula Jones suit against Bill Clinton, noting that the US Supreme Court failed to conclude then that simply being president shielded Clinton from civil litigation.
The decision, which increases the prospect that Trump could have to sit for sworn questioning in the lawsuit, was not unanimous. Her resolve to stay quiet changed, she said, after an "Access Hollywood" recording emerged in October 2016 of Trump boasting about groping women.
Trump's legal team argued that the U.S. Constitution immunizes him from state court lawsuits arising from his private conduct before he took office. They also say his comments were opinions and protected free speech.More news: Thiem into Indian Wells semi-finals as Monfils pulls out
Trump has denied Zervos' claims and called her case politically motivated. But in their ruling on Thursday, the court said that finding the president in contempt would be a "hypothetical scenario that is highly unlikely to occur in the context of this lawsuit". Subjecting the president to a state trial court's jurisdiction "interferes with his ability to carry out his constitutional duty of executing the laws of the United States", the dissent said. Both Trump and Zervos are Republicans. That paved the way for Clinton's impeachment the following year.
The court also ruled that Zervos had made out a sufficient claim of defamation, and her suit was not barred by California's anti-SLAPP law. Daniels, whose given name is Stephanie Clifford, had argued that Trump defamed her when he suggested that she had lied about being threatened to keep quiet about their alleged past relationship.
Zervos is seeking a retraction, an apology, and compensatory and punitive damages.
In a statement to Deadline today, attorney Wang of Cuti Hecker Wang LLP said: "We are very pleased that the First Department has affirmed once again that Defendant 'is not above the law".More news: Beto O'Rourke: Punk from El Paso joins 2020 race
- Huawei Watch GT with 2-Week Battery Life Launched in India
- Bangladesh cricket team escape shooting at Christchurch mosque
- What can Arsenal expect from Napoli in the Europa League quarter-finals?
- Christchurch attacker meant to continue rampage when arrested: PM Ardern
- Rice reveals he's 'proud and honoured' to get England call up
- Conservative Party split down the middle as Parliament votes to delay Brexit
- Alleged Gambino Crime Boss Shot, Killed Outside Staten Island Home
- Game of Thrones Final Season Episode Runtimes Are Shorter Than You Thought
- Hammond talks up United Kingdom economy despite Brexit 'cloud'
- Workers on Bernie Sanders' 2020 campaign have unionized