A United States judge has blocked the construction of a controversial oil pipeline from Canada to the US.
A federal judge temporarily blocked construction of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, ruling late Thursday that the Trump administration had failed to justify its decision granting a permit for the 1,200-mile long project created to connect Canada's tar sands crude oil with refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast.
It had been rejected two years earlier by the Obama administration, mainly on environmental grounds.
In August, Judge Morris ruled that the State Department must supplement a more thorough study of potential environmental effects of the pipeline. "Today, the courts showed the Trump administration and their corporate polluter friends that they can not bully rural landowners, farmers, environmentalists and Native communities". But groups that have been seeking to block the $8bn (£6bn) project are celebrating.
"Today's ruling makes it clear once and for all that it's time for TransCanada to give up on their Keystone XL pipe dream", Sierra Club senior attorney Doug Hayes said in a statement.More news: 'Will you murder anybody?': Texas judge releases juveniles after election loss
Morris particularly criticized the Trump administration for ignoring the recognized effects of the pipeline on climate change.
What is the Keystone XL Pipeline?
If built, it would transport around 830,000 barrels of crude oil per day from Alberta, Canada, and the Bakken Shale Formation in Montana to facilities near Steele City, Neb.
Shawnee Rae, age 8, among a group of Native American activists from the Sisseton-Wahpeton tribe protesting the Keystone XL Pipeline in Watertown, S.D.in 2015.
No immediate impact in oil markets is seen, as the pipeline isn't scheduled to come online for years regardless of the ruling.More news: Formula One to race on streets of Vietnam’s capital city
What did the ruling say?
"An agency can not simply disregard contrary or inconvenient factual determinations that it made in the past", Judge Morris said in his ruling.
The reversal required a "reasoned explanation" but instead the State Department discarded prior "factual findings", he said.
He said the decision also fell short in other areas, including the impact on Native American lands, and did not take into proper consideration issues like oil spills and low prices.More news: These Are the Victims in the Thousand Oaks Bar Shooting
- Lewis Hamilton arrives for Brazil GP in tracksuit and denim combo
- Australian police say several people stabbed in Melbourne; man arrested
- Ariana Grande Stumbles and Falls During Performance on 'Ellen'
- MI is in the playoff - for now
- Danny Welbeck injury: Has Welbeck played his last game for Arsenal?
- Star Wars: Diego Luna Will Star in a Rogue One Prequel Series
- China doesn't reveal if it offered loans to Pakistan
- Mourinho hails Fellaini as United's game-changer
- Assassin’s Creed Odyssey gets New Quests and more this November
- Democrats have a plan if Trump fires Mueller in 'Saturday Night Massacre'