"A casual visit for giving advice may not be covered by the expression "practice", the bench of Justices A.K. Goel and U.U. Lalit said.
The Centre, represented by Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh, had called upon the Bar Council to exercise its power under Section 49 (1)(e) of the Act of 1961 and frame the rules governing the practice of law in India by foreign lawyers and law firms. The top court upheld the judgements by the Madras High Court in 2012 and the Bombay High Court in 2009 that foreign lawyers may only offer advice on foreign laws on a "fly-in-fly-out" basis.
Referring to the Advocates Act and the Bar Council Rules, the top court said, "We uphold the view of the Bombay High Court and Madras High Court in para 63 (i) of the judgment to the effect that foreign law firms/companies or foreign lawyers can not practice profession of law in India either in the litigation or in non-litigation side".More news: Genes Affect Your Empathy Levels, Like Experiences Do
Due to a phenomenal increase in worldwide arbitrations involving foreign litigants, foreign law firms and lawyers have started appearing in many legal proceedings in India.
The Court has also permitted foreign lawyers to participate in global commercial arbitrations, subject to institutional rules. "We want foreign lawyers to come so as to not deny the Indian advocates of the same privilege in other countries".
The court's verdict came on batch of petitions filed by Bar Council of India and others.More news: Jeff Goldblum Returns as Dr
"These are parts of non-litigation practice which is part of practice of law" and the Advocates Act makes it clear that those enrolled with the Bar Council alone are entitled to practice law as regulatory mechanism for conduct of advocates also applies to non-litigation work", the court held in a 52-page judgment.
In the alternative, he has sought for a direction quashing Rule 49 of the Bar Council of India Rules as ultra vires the Constitution and its basic structure, and to permit all Public Servants to practice as Advocates.
The Supreme Court on Monday sought a response from the Bar Council of India (BCI) on a plea for ban on lawmakers from practising as advocates.More news: Georginio Wijnaldum and Jordan Henderson cleared for Manchester United trip
The court rejected the contention that the Advocates Act applies only if a person is practicing Indian law.
- Stormy Daniels Seeks New Judge in Trump Lawsuit
- Virginia's DeAndre Hunter to Miss NCAA Tournament After Suffering Wrist Injury
- Cousins Plans to Sign with Vikings Thursday
- McLeish call-ups boost for Scotland youths, says Gemmill
- President Trump Wants To Create A 'Space Force' To Fight Space Wars
- Queer Eye: Tom and ex-wife Abby are engaged!
- Stephanie Skipper on The Voice Tells Kelly Clarkson "Don't Apologize"
- Frustration among millennials as new railcard site crashes
- Bangor University staff to remain on strike after pension deal rejected
- Toys R Us is going out of business, closing all stores