Trump has stepped back from daily management of his businesses, which have been placed into a trust run by his sons and another close associate.
Democrats said that Trump violates the Constitution, which forbids public officials from accepting gifts or emoluments from foreign governments and economic benefits from federal or state governments (that are not his salary.) The objective of this ban is to curb corruption.
"Again, the reason why we're here is because the President of the United States, in a wholly unprecedented fashion, has made a decision to maintain a sprawling global business empire that accepts money without account from foreign governments", Mr Racine said.
"This is about whether the president is loyal to the American people and the American people alone", Gupta told the AP.More news: Sessions wants his testimony open to public
The suit says, for example, the hotel diverts customers away from businesses the District of Columbia and Maryland own, license or tax, causing those governments direct financial harm.
The suit accuses Trump of violating the Constitution by letting his businesses accept payments from foreign governments.
Both attorney generals allege with his business ties still intact President Trump gives off the illusion he's putting his personal business ahead of the business of the American people.
"The suit was filed by two Democratic attorney generals".
The White House didn't immediately respond to requests for comment Monday. That lawsuit is seeking a court order to compel Trump to divest from his business holdings on grounds that the constitution prohibits him from making money from foreign governments or making a profit beyond the presidential salary.More news: England rests Stokes, Woakes and Moeen amid injury worries
The attorneys general for Maryland and Washington D.C. filed a lawsuit Monday against President Donald Trump, alleging that he violated the Constitution's anti-corruption clauses by accepting payments from foreign governments since taking office.
They said the fight would likely end up before the Supreme Court.
Racine and Frosh contend Trump's actions "threaten the free and independent self-governance at the core of our democracy". "We can not treat a president's ongoing violations of the Constitution and disregard for the rights of the American people as the new and acceptable status quo".
"We're getting in here to be the check and balance that it appears Congress is unwilling to be", Racine said.
But there's another angle to what the attorneys general may hope to accomplish with the latest lawsuit.
The lawsuit, which comes days after the Justice Department defended Trump's business empire from accepting foreign payments in a separate, similar case, alleges that the president has violated the Emoluments Clause by accepting millions of dollars in payments on properties his company owns.More news: Qatari FM says dialogue the only way to solve the crisis
Trump retains ownership of his company and is to receive regular updates, the newspaper said.
- South Korean President Moon Proposes 2030 World Cup In Region
- US targets some Iraqis for deportation in wake of travel ban deal
- Troops raise tri-colors as bombs fall on Marawi City
- Trump administration rejects the future in rejecting Paris Agreement
- Stephen Curry, Kevin Durant double-team a reporter asking about his squatting
- Qatar Downplays Effects of Diplomatic Crisis
- Bernie Sanders votes down Trump nominee for adhering to Christian belief
- The Mummy has monstrously bad US opening
- Three arrested in connection with London Bridge terror attack
- Bill Cosby Trial, Day 6 - Defense's Case Lasts All of 6 Minutes?