In short, the decision reads, despite the fact that FMRA bars any promulgation of new rules or regulations for model aircraft, the 2015 registration rule is, in the FAA's own words, a "rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft".
"AUVSI is disappointed with the decision today by the U.S. Court of Appeals to reject the FAA's rule for registering recreational unmanned aircraft systems". Failure to do so could result in fines of up to $27,500, as well as potential criminal penalties of up to three years in prison, and additional fines of up to $250,000.
While he filed the case himself, Taylor said he had the assistance of several attorneys who specialize in aviation law.
In its decision handed down today (see opinion) the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia was pretty direct. "We are in the process of considering our options and response to the decision", it said.More news: Trump approval at lowest level since inauguration
The FAA responded to the ruling, saying it is "carefully" reviewing the decision.
In March, the FAA head Michael Huerta said that one of the next set of problems it plans to tackle for drone regulations will be to craft a way for unmanned aircraft to be remotely identified, which will help law enforcement know who is flying a drone, even if the pilot isn't visible.
Kavanaugh turned aside the FAA's assertion that it was authorized by existing rules to register drones, essentially finding no distinction between a drone and Boeing 737 aircraft.
The world's largest drone manufacturer, China-based SZ DJI Technology Co.
The Federal Aviation Administration had adopted the rule in 2015, no small, unmanned drones could take to the sky before their owners paid a $5 registration fee with disclosure of their names and any mailing and email addresses.More news: Sweden drops prosecution against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
The drone registration debate is separate from the debate over FAA regulations governing commercial drone operations, such as the delivery systems being planned by Amazon and other companies.
Ahead of Friday's ruling, the FAA told the appeals court that "it would threaten the safety of the national airspace system" if the court nullified the registration requirement. "The Registration Rule is unlawful as applied to model aircraft".
In March, Huerta gave a speech where he said that America is considered "the gold standard in aviation, " due to the safety regulations put in place by the FAA.
Taylor also challenged FAA restrictions on where drones can operate in the Washington area.
The FAA issued its first batch of rules for small commercial drones a year ago, and further regulatory actions are expected to address such scenarios as flights over the uninvolved public and flights beyond an operator's line of sight.More news: Report Claims 10.5-inch iPad Pro Production Is Ramping Up For June
- Arsenal's Granit Xhaka doubtful for Southhampton clash due to injury
- UN court orders Pakistan not to execute Indian 'spy' Kulbhushan Jadhav
- Sunderland goalkeeper can succeed De Gea says Manchester United legend
- Lakers Rumors: Possible trade packages for the second overall pick
- FCC security manhandles a Washington reporter trying to ask a question
- Arsenal players keen on Sanchez stay: Koscielny
- Trump Welcomes Colombia's President to White House
- Haryana HBSE 10th Result 2017
- Senators chase Fleury, rout Penguins in Game 3
- Trump White House enters a new state of denial